So in this video, we're going to talk about this and witness, so let's see what we know.
What are these?
We have the Dena's for name resolution.
So these are minor.
And entertainers are also used for demonstration when DNS fails to resolve a particular name, specifically
larcombe, that does not exist.
So the first then when those systems use a little minor and DNS services, uh, transfer link, local
multicast, no resolution.
So you will understand at the end of the video why this is called multicast and system for other Nakash.
So they have that Nakash and the name was not found.
Then it was broadcast to our computers asking for that name in the subnet.
So what they want to LexisNexis dot com are they want to access the file share sir.
That is uh temporary.
So let's say some sample of it.
So that sample share is not present and then it will ask for all the computers in the subnet, whether
each computer, how to share or not.
Now since that username and then Talum hash, even though it is Pretoria's once.
So if anyone says that I have this share, then the client will send the user and then hash.
So then the computer can tell whether it has to share or not.
But the request contains this username.
And so even if they use a password has been very weak, then you can crack this hash with John Ashcroft.
So if you think the hash password will be strong, then there is no point in cracking.
So you can try, uh, with the tools.
So now let's come into this and Buthayna stands for net worth names, although this is also seem like
business and I am not.
But there is some there are some changes between that and DNS.
It is similar to the NSA and there but it's only IP.
So if you want to, uh, access the business that he's using IP, then you need to use this because,
I mean, I support abortion and be watching for as well.
And you need to remember the order in which there were no systems.
Uh, use these protocols first.
DNS will be checked and then I I'm not an entertainer.
So Beaners had a higher priority and then I ended and muteness so but it is how we can pois in this
manner and how do we get the user and that parum hash.
So you can see the diagram Major have got from the Internet, uh, see the stuff funded commission.
And is there being a server stepdown user since incorrupt as ambushers.
So was if user types mis misspelled the to personnel then it was for the DNA however and Denisova response
with this shit has not been for then uh because of the NSA for you, it will broadcast to all the uh,
computers in the software.
Farshid with a Nakash of course it will be not formed because it's not Cartwright so that this will
perform, not be broadcast.
Now we have this attack commission on what we going to do is we will say that we will use this responder
responder is a Python script, uh, responder's the that I have this, this is zero one and it will
accept that until two years after accepting the hash it will say that I do not have and there is an
error in finding this.
So this we think, uh, will not raise anything because it will think that it's a legitimate response,
legitimate request and a different response.
So this is the overall view of this.
Uh, I I'm not poisoning or we need to do this.
We need to go on this with the responder.
And whenever the victim types the incorrect assumption trust, then our responder, uh, will capture
the NPRM to have action to Hirsch and his partner sends the error back to the grid.
So whatever.
We don't care about this response.
All we care about this is a. war watching to.
So I think that's all for this video.
Even you can Google search for and witness or no tapes.
There are some tapes.
However, even though we do not tape has been set up, uh, this broadcast will occur and we will get
the entire motion to hash.